← Abuse of Power · The Record
TIER B Courts & Congress
Documented incident

Operation Absolute Resolve: bombing Venezuela and seizing its head of state

Editor's note: official records document the strikes and capture without congressional authorization, and experts dispute their legality, but no court or official finding establishes them as unlawful.

Scores: V 72, C 73, scored on September 27, 2026
Institutional outcome
A sitting head of state was seized by force and delivered to a U.S. court, where he pleaded not guilty on January 5. Congress was briefed after the fact and behind closed doors. Both chambers considered War Powers resolutions directing an end to unauthorized hostilities; none was approved, though the Senate voted on January 8 to advance one. Trump said the United States would 'run' Venezuela until a transition, and that its officials would turn over sanctioned oil reportedly worth about $3 billion.
What happened

Beginning about 2 a.m. on January 3, 2026, U.S. forces bombed infrastructure across northern Venezuela to suppress air defenses while an apprehension force struck Maduro's compound in Caracas. Maduro and his wife Cilia Flores were flown to New York and arraigned on narco-terrorism, drug trafficking, and weapons charges, pleading not guilty on January 5. Gen. Dan Caine said the operation, named Absolute Resolve, followed months of planning, with a CIA team inside Venezuela since August tracking Maduro's movements and elite troops rehearsing against a replica of his compound. Seven U.S. service members were injured. The New York Times reported the overall death toll had risen to about eighty, citing a senior Venezuelan official; Cuba said thirty-two of its citizens were killed. The operation followed months of lethal strikes on alleged drug vessels documented at DEF-09.

The administration said no authorization was required. Rubio told ABC that 'this was an arrest operation. This was a law enforcement operation,' and that Maduro had been arrested by FBI agents, read his rights, and removed from the country. Republicans defended the action as within the president's Article II powers; Sen. Mike Lee said it likely fell under the authority to protect against actual or imminent attack. Congressional Research Service records that both chambers considered but did not approve War Powers resolutions directing the president to terminate unauthorized hostilities, and that the Senate voted on January 8 to advance one such measure. Members were briefed in closed session after the fact. Several Democratic senators said they had been misled: Sen. Andy Kim wrote that Rubio and Hegseth 'looked every Senator in the eye a few weeks ago and said this wasn't about regime change,' and that 'we see now that they blatantly lied to Congress.'

The case for the operation is not trivial and belongs in the record. Maduro was indicted in the United States in 2020 on drug charges; he retained power in January 2025 despite election results indicating he had lost to Edmundo Gonzalez; and opposition leader Maria Corina Machado, along with several Latin American and European leaders, welcomed his removal. But the Congressional Research Service notes that experts have disputed the administration's claims about the existence of a non-international armed conflict, Maduro's direction of the Tren de Aragua gang, and the stolen oil. The UN Secretary-General said the action set a 'dangerous precedent.' Trump said afterward that the United States would 'run' Venezuela for the foreseeable future and take control of its oil industry, and Rep. Kevin Mullin alleged that the administration 'tipped off the oil companies before notifying elected leaders,' an allegation that remains unverified.

Evidence status
Documented; the operation was announced by the president and detailed by the Joint Chiefs chairman
Legal status
The administration asserts the operation was a law enforcement arrest requiring no congressional authorization; War Powers resolutions in both chambers were considered and not approved. The UN Secretary-General said the action set a dangerous precedent, and legal experts dispute the claimed basis
Dates
2026-01-03 onward
Key actors
Sources
Back to the archive

One entry from Trexit's documented record of abuse of power. Tier A = an official record establishes what makes the conduct abuse of power; Tier B = documented by independent reporting or disclosures, but no official record establishes it. How we verify →